🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial policy to ban social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples internationally. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and families are watching with great interest to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Movement

Across Europe, a rising group of states are considering comparable measures.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM declaring that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our children's childhood". A law may be formalized next year.
• Norway is set to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard the young from the "power of the AI".
• The Irish government is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an similar ban could be "a potential tools on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has urged parliament to pass a bill raising the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a comparable action, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged parents to prevent their kids from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has adopted a non-binding resolution calling for a ban for minors except if a parent decides otherwise is provided. While it warns of the "addictive" quality of these apps, the step does not enact mandatory rules.

"A clear age restriction is a good starting point," stated a leading European lawmaker driving the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is being dismissed" but maintaining any policy must be "supported by robust research".

Previously, support built behind a proposal to enact controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. Nonetheless, the government vowed to investigate the issue.

Charities have voiced concerns. One foundation set up by the relatives of a girl who died after encountering disturbing online content argues that a strict age ban may not improve online safety and could create a "cliff edge" of exposure when users become eligible.

"This ban is a answer to the refusal of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are appropriate and suitable for minors," said a prominent online safety campaigner.

America: A State-by-State Picture

Stateside, legislation is primarily happening at the local level due to national gridlock.

• Utah demands parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure banning children under fourteen from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a law restricting minors to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra use requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly passed bills requiring parental consent for under-16s to create social media accounts.

Even with bipartisan support and calls from some politicians to follow this path, a US-wide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Outside of Europe and the US, further nations are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for Instagram to 16.

However, global agencies adopt a more measured stance. Unicef has advised that social media bans carry risks and "may even backfire". The body points out that the internet can be a "lifeline" for marginalized young people and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to improve safety.

Even as this international discussion continues, the steps of Australia and several other countries show that states around the world are less and less content to stand by for platforms to self-regulate.